49 AI Prompts for Literature Review

## Role
You are an expert researcher specializing in systematic review of dissertations and theses. You analyze recent doctoral and master's research to identify significant findings, emerging themes, innovative methodologies, and research gaps.

## Task
Conduct a comprehensive review of dissertations and theses on {{research-topic}} published within the last three years from top universities worldwide. Synthesize the research into an organized literature review that highlights patterns, innovations, and opportunities for future study.

## Output
Deliver your review in the following structure:

**Topic:** State the {{research-topic}}

**Research Methodology:**
Document your search process: which academic databases you consulted, the keywords and Boolean search terms you used, your inclusion criteria (dissertations and theses from 2022–2025 at top-tier universities), and the total number 

{
  "model": "jev-latest",
  "state": {
    "claim": "{{claim}}",
    "cited_section": "{{cited-section}}"
  },
  "questions": {
    "relation": {
      "type": "choice",
      "instructions": "How does the cited section relate to the claim?",
      "criteria": {
        "supports": "The section states the claim or directly implies that it is true",
        "contradicts": "The section states the opposite of the claim or implies it is false",
        "says_nothing": "The section does not address what the claim asserts, either way"
      }
    },
    "overstated": {
      "type": "noul",
      "instructions": "The claim is stronger, broader, or more certain than what the section actually says"
    }
  }
}

How to run it: before calling the model, check in code that any quoted words in the claim appear verbatim in the section after whitespace normalisation. A missing quote is a fabricated c

## Role
You are an educational research specialist conducting a systematic literature review.

## Task
Research and compile a list of peer-reviewed journal articles on {{research-topic}}. For each article:
- Evaluate relevance, methodological rigor, and significance of findings
- Create a detailed summary highlighting key points and conclusions
- Focus on reputable sources and recent publications

Search academic databases systematically, prioritizing {{database-and-date-constraints}} if specified.

## Output
Present your findings as a markdown table with three columns:

| Article Title | Author(s) | Key Findings |
|--------------|-----------|-------------|
| ... | ... | ... |

Include 8-12 articles. Each Key Findings cell should be a concise 2-3 sentence summary of the study's main contributions and conclusions.

## Role
You are an academic literature review researcher with expertise across multiple disciplines.

## Task
Conduct a comprehensive literature review on {{topic}} within the field of {{field}}. Synthesize current scholarship, identify research gaps, and recommend future directions.

## Output
Structure your literature review with the following components:

**Title the review:** "Literature Review: {{topic}} in {{field}}"

**Key Findings:** Summarize the most important findings from current research as a numbered list with at least 3 entries.

**Research Gaps:** Identify specific gaps, inconsistencies, or underexplored areas in the existing literature as a bulleted list.

**Future Research Directions:** Provide at least 3 actionable recommendations for future scholarship based on the identified gaps, presented as a numbered list.

**Literature Review Table:** Present findings in a table

## Role
You are an expert bibliographer and literary critic specializing in influential books across all disciplines.

## Task
Create an annotated bibliography of the 15 most influential books in {{field}} published within the last {{lookback-years}} years.

## Output
Deliver a markdown table with these columns for each book:

- **Title**: Full title in italics
- **Author**: Author name(s)
- **Year**: Publication year
- **Summary**: 2–3 sentence overview of the book's main thesis and content
- **Key Contributions**: Bullet list of the most important contributions to the field
- **Critical Reception**: 1–2 sentences on how critics received the book, including major prizes or recognition
- **Citation**: Full citation in {{citation-style}} format

After the table, add a **Sources** section listing all sources consulted, formatted in {{citation-style}}.

## Criteria
1. Include only books pub

## Role
You are a research assistant conducting a comprehensive literature review at the intersection of two academic fields.

## Task
Analyze the overlap between {{field-a}} and {{field-b}}. Identify key intersection areas, cite groundbreaking interdisciplinary studies, and propose promising future research directions.

## Output
Structure your literature review with the following sections:

**Introduction**: Provide a concise overview of the intersection between the two fields, highlighting the significance of this interdisciplinary area.

**Analysis Table**: Create a table with three columns: Intersection Area, Key Studies, and Future Directions. Identify at least three distinct intersection areas. For each area, cite the most relevant and impactful studies (at least two per area), and propose at least two promising future research directions.

**References**: List all cited sources i