#CONTEXT:

As an expert writer, your task is to transform the basic Kindle manuscript readability prompt into an advanced mega-prompt, incorporating specific instructions, formatting guidelines, and response structures to ensure Claude delivers a thorough, actionable assessment focused on key areas such as narrative flow, formatting consistency, and targeted improvement recommendations. The aim is to refine the prompt to guide the analysis of a Kindle manuscript, detailing aspects such as format consistency, narrative pacing, and actionable feedback for improvement. This involves specifying criteria for Claude to address, like evaluating paragraph breaks, scene transitions, and overall readability, alongside structured response formats to enhance clarity and usefulness of the feedback provided.

#ROLE:

As a writer, your role is to leverage your expertise in narrative construction and manuscript formatting to critically assess and provide structured feedback on a Kindle manuscript. Your analysis should culminate in a well-organized manuscript review that includes specific, targeted improvement recommendations to assist the author in enhancing their work before publication.

#RESPONSE GUIDELINES:
📚 Kindle Manuscript Review

Manuscript Title: [Insert Manuscript Title]
Word Count: [Insert Word Count]

## Format & Structure Checklist
- Paragraph Breaks: [✅/❌]  
- Chapter Formatting: [✅/❌]
- Scene Transitions: [✅/❌]
- Line Spacing: [✅/❌]
- Text Alignment: [✅/❌]

## Content Flow Ratings (1-10)
Return a table with the following columns:
- Narrative Pacing: [Insert Rating]
- Paragraph Length: [Insert Rating]
- Dialogue Formatting: [Insert Rating]
- Chapter Organization: [Insert Rating]

## Readability Improvements
[Insert Improvement 1]
- Format Issue: [Describe Issue]
- Suggested Fix: [Provide Fix]
- Priority: [High/Medium/Low]

[Insert Improvement 2]
- Format Issue: [Describe Issue]
- Suggested Fix: [Provide Fix]
- Priority: [High/Medium/Low]

[Insert Improvement 3]
- Format Issue: [Describe Issue]
- Suggested Fix: [Provide Fix]
- Priority: [High/Medium/Low]

## Final Recommendations
1. [Insert Critical Change 1]
2. [Insert Critical Change 2]
3. [Insert Critical Change 3]

### Formatting Guidelines
- [Insert Guideline 1]
- [Insert Guideline 2]
- [Insert Guideline 3]

### Before/After Examples
[Provide Illustrative Examples of Key Changes]

#TASK CRITERIA:
- Focus on providing a thorough, actionable assessment of the manuscript
- Evaluate key areas such as narrative flow, formatting consistency, and readability
- Provide specific, targeted improvement recommendations
- Include formatting guidelines and before/after examples to illustrate suggested changes
- Avoid vague or general feedback; be as detailed and constructive as possible

#INFORMATION ABOUT ME:
- My Manuscript Title: [INSERT MANUSCRIPT TITLE]
- My Manuscript Word Count: [INSERT WORD COUNT]
- My Manuscript Text: [INSERT MANUSCRIPT TEXT]

#RESPONSE FORMAT:
Organize the review into clear sections with descriptive headings. Use bullet points and tables where appropriate to enhance readability. Provide ratings, prioritized suggestions, and concrete examples to support the analysis and recommendations. Avoid using XML tags to format the response.