Premium

ChatGPT Prompt

Conduct Systematic Review Analysis

💡

Optimize your research with this mega-prompt for ChatGPT, designed for experts conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It guides you through a structured approach to assess interventions, from developing a search strategy to synthesizing findings in detailed visual formats, ensuring methodological rigor and clarity in reporting.

What This Prompt Does:

● Guides the user through the process of conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis, including search strategy and study selection. ● Provides a detailed framework for assessing the methodological quality of studies, analyzing effect sizes, and examining study heterogeneity. ● Instructs on synthesizing and presenting findings in a structured format with visual aids like forest plots and summary tables.

Tips:

● Develop a comprehensive search strategy by identifying relevant databases and using specific search terms related to the intervention, condition, and target population to ensure all pertinent studies are captured. ● Utilize the PRISMA flowchart to transparently document and display the study selection process, enhancing the credibility and reproducibility of your systematic review. ● Employ robust tools like Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool for methodological quality assessment and use meta-analysis software like RevMan or Stata to calculate effect sizes and heterogeneity, ensuring accurate and reliable results.

📊 Meta-Analysis System Optimizer

ChatGPT Prompt

#CONTEXT:
You are an expert systematic reviewer and meta-analyst tasked with conducting a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of a specified intervention/treatment for a given condition/problem in a target population. Your goal is to critically appraise the methodological quality of included studies, calculate and interpret effect sizes, examine heterogeneity, and synthesize the findings in a visually compelling format.

#ROLE:
Adopt the role of a highly skilled systematic reviewer and meta-analyst with expertise in rigorously evaluating the effectiveness of interventions across various domains.

#RESPONSE GUIDELINES:
The response should be organized into the following sections:
1. Search Strategy: List databases searched, search terms used, and inclusion/exclusion criteria.
2. Study Selection Flowchart: Insert a PRISMA flowchart showing the study selection process.
3. Study Characteristics Table: Insert a table summarizing key characteristics of included studies.
4. Methodological Quality Assessment: Describe the tool used and summarize quality assessment results.
5. Effect Size Analysis: Specify the effect size metric, report the pooled effect size with 95% CI, and report and interpret the I^2 statistic for heterogeneity.
6. Forest Plot: Insert a forest plot displaying effect sizes and pooled estimate.
7. Summary of Findings Table: Insert a GRADE summary of findings table.
8. Discussion: Summarize main results, discuss the review's strengths and limitations, and discuss implications for practice and research.
9. References: List all sources cited using an appropriate citation style.

#TASK CRITERIA:
- Conduct a comprehensive and rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis
- Critically appraise the methodological quality of included studies
- Calculate and interpret effect sizes and examine heterogeneity
- Synthesize findings in a visually compelling format, including a forest plot and summary of findings table
- Ensure all sources used are properly cited
- Avoid bias and maintain objectivity throughout the review process

#INFORMATION ABOUT ME:
- My intervention/treatment: [SPECIFY INTERVENTION/TREATMENT]
- My condition/problem: [SPECIFY CONDITION/PROBLEM]
- My population: [SPECIFY POPULATION]

#RESPONSE FORMAT:
The response should be formatted using markdown, with appropriate headings, subheadings, bullet points, and tables as needed. The forest plot and study selection flowchart should be inserted as images. The references should be listed using an appropriate citation style.

Copy

COPIED

GET FULL ACCESS

#CONTEXT:
You are SEO Checker AI, an SEO professional who helps Entrepreneurs make their blog 
articles more SEO-friendly. You are a world-class expert in finding SEO issues and 
giving recommendationson how to fix them.

#GOAL:
I want you to analyze my blog article and give me recommendations on improving its SEO.
I need this information to rank better at Google. 

#FORMAT OF OUR INTERACTION
1. I will provide you with the source code of my blog article
2. You will analyze the page source code
3. You will give me a holistic analysis of its SEO in the checklist format:
- SEO score from 1 to 10
- What is done right
- What is done wrong

#SEO CHECKLIST CRITERIA:
- Your checklist should have 20-30 criteria
- Be specific and concise. Your criteria should be self-explanatory
- Include numbers in the criteria if it's applicable
- Focus on SEO practices that have the biggest impact on ranking 
- Prioritize SEO practices that are widely recognizable by the SEO community
- Don't include irrelevant SEO practices with zero to no impact on this article

#RESPONSE STRUCTURE:
## SEO Score

## What's done right
✅ Criteria
✅ Criteria
✅ Criteria

## What's done wrong
❌ Criteria
❌ Criteria
❌ Criteria

#RESPONSE FORMATTING:
Use Markdown. Follow the response structure.

How To Use The Prompt:

● Fill in the [SPECIFY INTERVENTION/TREATMENT], [SPECIFY CONDITION/PROBLEM], and [SPECIFY POPULATION] placeholders with the specific details of the intervention or treatment you are reviewing, the medical or health condition it addresses, and the demographic characteristics of the population affected. - Example: If you are reviewing the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in adults, fill in as follows: [SPECIFY INTERVENTION/TREATMENT] with "Cognitive Behavioral Therapy", [SPECIFY CONDITION/PROBLEM] with "Depression", and [SPECIFY POPULATION] with "Adults". ● Use these specific details to tailor your systematic review and meta-analysis, ensuring that each section of your response is relevant to the intervention, condition, and population you have defined. This will help maintain focus and relevance throughout your analysis.

Example Input:

#INFORMATION ABOUT ME: ● My intervention/treatment: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ● My condition/problem: Generalized Anxiety Disorder ● My population: Adults aged 18-65

Example Output:

Additional Tips:

● When developing your search strategy, consider using a combination of both controlled vocabulary terms (such as MeSH terms) and keywords to capture all relevant studies. This will help ensure that you do not miss any potentially important articles. ● In your study selection flowchart, clearly indicate the number of articles identified, screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in your review. This will provide transparency and allow readers to understand the flow of studies throughout the review process. ● When summarizing the key characteristics of included studies in your table, consider including information such as study design, sample size, intervention details, outcome measures, and follow-up duration. This will provide readers with a clear overview of the included studies and their characteristics. ● When interpreting the effect size and heterogeneity, consider using forest plots to visually display the individual study effect sizes and the overall pooled estimate. This will help readers to easily understand the magnitude and direction of the intervention's effect. ● In your discussion section, not only summarize the main results but also discuss any limitations of your review, such as potential biases or limitations in the included studies. This will provide a balanced perspective and help readers to interpret the findings appropriately.

Additional Information:

Optimize your research with the mega-prompt for ChatGPT, designed to guide systematic reviewers and meta-analysts through the complex process of evaluating the effectiveness of interventions for specific conditions in targeted populations. This tool is meticulously structured to enhance the accuracy and impact of your systematic review and meta-analysis. ● Streamline the development of a comprehensive search strategy and study selection. ● Facilitate the critical appraisal of methodological quality and calculation of effect sizes. ● Enable the synthesis of findings in a visually compelling and statistically sound manner. By leveraging this mega-prompt, researchers can ensure a rigorous evaluation process, supported by detailed guidelines for each phase of the review, from the search strategy to the final discussion and synthesis of findings. The inclusion of tools like PRISMA flowcharts and GRADE tables aids in maintaining transparency and objectivity, crucial for high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In conclusion, the mega-prompt for ChatGPT is an indispensable resource for researchers committed to conducting methodologically sound and impactful systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

🔗 Related Prompts:

Premium

Create MLA Citations

Uncover the latest trends and insights in your field with this ChatGPT mega-prompt, delivering a comprehensive, well-researched report that engages readers.