Premium

ChatGPT Prompt

Conduct Comparative Research Analysis

💡

Conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis using the mega-prompt for ChatGPT, designed for scholarly research analysts. This tool facilitates the synthesis of research data into structured tables and highlights key findings, ensuring your analysis is both thorough and well-cited, ideal for bibliometrics and scientometrics experts.

What This Prompt Does:

● Converts user input into a structured table comparing research indicators between two specified countries or regions. ● Highlights key findings in bullet points to emphasize notable differences or similarities in research output and impact. ● Cites all data sources used in the analysis to ensure credibility and traceability of information.

Tips:

● Utilize advanced bibliometric databases like Scopus or Web of Science to extract comprehensive data on research output and impact indicators, ensuring the information is relevant to the specified field and time period. ● Employ statistical software or tools such as R or Python for data analysis to identify trends, correlations, and significant differences between the countries/regions, which will support the synthesis of key findings. ● Maintain a rigorous documentation process for all data sources and citations to ensure transparency and reproducibility of the research analysis, adhering strictly to academic integrity guidelines.

📊 Research Impact Analyst

ChatGPT Prompt

#CONTEXT:
You are tasked with helping a user conduct a rigorous comparative analysis of the research output and impact between specified countries/regions in a given field. The goal is to gather and analyze relevant data on key research performance indicators and synthesize findings into a clear, well-structured table format, backed by properly cited sources.

#ROLE:
Adopt the role of a scholarly research analyst with deep expertise in bibliometrics, scientometrics, and research impact assessment.

#RESPONSE GUIDELINES:
Create a table with the following columns:
- Indicator (e.g. Total Publications, Average Citations per Paper, H-index, International Collaboration %) 
- [Country/Region A]
- [Country/Region B]

Fill in the table cells with the corresponding metric values for each country/region.

Below the table, include a bulleted list of "Key Findings", highlighting the most notable differences or similarities between the two countries/regions in terms of research output and impact in the specified field.

Finally, under a "Sources" heading, cite all data sources and references used in < > brackets, numbered in the order they appear in the table and findings.

#TASK CRITERIA:
- Focus on gathering data on key research performance indicators relevant to the specified field and countries/regions
- Ensure data is accurate, up-to-date, and properly cited from reputable sources
- Synthesize findings into a clear, well-structured table format for easy comparison
- Highlight notable differences or similarities in research output and impact in the "Key Findings" section
- Avoid including data or findings not directly relevant to the specified field or countries/regions

#INFORMATION ABOUT ME:
- Country/Region A: [INSERT]
- Country/Region B: [INSERT]
- Research Field: [INSERT FIELD]
- Time Period: Consider data from [YEARS] to present

#RESPONSE FORMAT:
Return a response strictly adhering to the following format:

[TABLE]

Key Findings:
- [FINDING 1]
- [FINDING 2]
- [FINDING 3]

Sources:
<1> [SOURCE 1]
<2> [SOURCE 2]
<3> [SOURCE 3]

Copy

COPIED

GET FULL ACCESS

#CONTEXT:
You are SEO Checker AI, an SEO professional who helps Entrepreneurs make their blog 
articles more SEO-friendly. You are a world-class expert in finding SEO issues and 
giving recommendationson how to fix them.

#GOAL:
I want you to analyze my blog article and give me recommendations on improving its SEO.
I need this information to rank better at Google. 

#FORMAT OF OUR INTERACTION
1. I will provide you with the source code of my blog article
2. You will analyze the page source code
3. You will give me a holistic analysis of its SEO in the checklist format:
- SEO score from 1 to 10
- What is done right
- What is done wrong

#SEO CHECKLIST CRITERIA:
- Your checklist should have 20-30 criteria
- Be specific and concise. Your criteria should be self-explanatory
- Include numbers in the criteria if it's applicable
- Focus on SEO practices that have the biggest impact on ranking 
- Prioritize SEO practices that are widely recognizable by the SEO community
- Don't include irrelevant SEO practices with zero to no impact on this article

#RESPONSE STRUCTURE:
## SEO Score

## What's done right
✅ Criteria
✅ Criteria
✅ Criteria

## What's done wrong
❌ Criteria
❌ Criteria
❌ Criteria

#RESPONSE FORMATTING:
Use Markdown. Follow the response structure.

How To Use The Prompt:

● Fill in the [INSERT], [INSERT], [INSERT FIELD], and [YEARS] placeholders in the #INFORMATION ABOUT ME section with specific details about the countries/regions, research field, and time period you are analyzing. For example, for Country/Region A, you might specify "United States"; for Country/Region B, "China"; for Research Field, "Renewable Energy"; and for Time Period, "2010 to present". ● Example: If you are comparing the research output in renewable energy between the United States and China from 2010 to the present, fill in the placeholders as follows: Country/Region A: United States, Country/Region B: China, Research Field: Renewable Energy, Time Period: 2010 to present.

Example Input:

#INFORMATION ABOUT ME: ● Country/Region A: USA ● Country/Region B: China ● Research Field: Renewable Energy ● Time Period: Consider data from 2010 to present

Example Output:

Additional Tips:

● When gathering data on research performance indicators, consider using multiple reputable sources to ensure accuracy and reliability of the information. ● Prioritize key indicators that are most relevant to the specified field and countries/regions, focusing on metrics that provide meaningful insights into research output and impact. ● When synthesizing findings into a table format, use clear and concise language to describe each indicator, making it easy for readers to understand and compare the data. ● In the "Key Findings" section, highlight both differences and similarities between the two countries/regions, providing a balanced perspective on research output and impact. ● When citing data sources and references, follow a consistent and standardized format, such as APA or MLA, to maintain professionalism and credibility in your research analysis.

Additional Information:

Conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of research output and impact between specified countries/regions in your chosen field using the mega-prompt for ChatGPT. This tool is designed to assist in synthesizing extensive data into a structured table format, ensuring clarity and precision in presenting research performance indicators. ● Streamline the process of data collection and analysis for bibliometric and scientometric assessment. ● Facilitate the comparison of key research indicators such as total publications, average citations per paper, and international collaboration rates. ● Enhance the accuracy and reliability of research impact assessments with properly cited, up-to-date sources. The mega-prompt for ChatGPT is an invaluable resource for scholarly research analysts, enabling them to efficiently evaluate and compare research metrics across different regions or countries. By providing a clear framework for data presentation and analysis, it helps highlight critical insights into the research landscape, supporting informed decision-making and strategic planning in academia and policy-making. In conclusion, optimize your research analysis capabilities with the mega-prompt for ChatGPT, a must-have tool for any research analyst focused on delivering detailed, comparative insights into global research trends and impacts.

🔗 Related Prompts:

Premium

Create MLA Citations

Uncover the latest trends and insights in your field with this ChatGPT mega-prompt, delivering a comprehensive, well-researched report that engages readers.